Case Type

Non-payment

Housing Type

Market Rate

Court

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

County

New York (Manhattan)

L&T / Index / Case / Docket / Clerk's Number

571371/23

Slip Opinion Number

2024 NY Slip Op 50317(U)

Petitioner

East Harlem MEC Parcel C, L.P.

Respondent

Reggie Smalls, John Doe and Jane Doe

Judge

Tisch, J.P., James, Perez

Decision/Order Date

2024-03-25

Posture

Post-answer Motion by Tenant

Disposition

Motion Granted for Tenant

Winner

Tenant Substantially Won

Synopsis

The appellate court affirmed the lower court's dismissal of the landlord's nonpayment petition against the tenant. The key issue was whether the landlord was precluded from recovering rent because the building lacked a valid certificate of occupancy after undergoing alterations. The court found that after a 2011 certificate was issued, the building had a "type 1" alteration including adding an eating/drinking establishment, and the subsequent temporary certificates from 2013-2015 had expired without a new certificate being issued. Under the Multiple Dwelling Law, a landlord cannot recover rent when the building lacks a valid certificate, even if the tenant's unit was not directly affected by the alterations. So the court ruled the landlord could not pursue the nonpayment case against the tenant due to the invalid certificate status resulting from the renovations.

Share

COinS