Case Type
Holdover-Other
Housing Type
HDFC
Court
Civil Court of the City of New York
County
Kings County (Brooklyn)
L&T / Index / Case / Docket / Clerk's Number
LT-306940-25/KI
Slip Opinion Number
2026 NY Slip Op 32212(U)
Petitioner
141 MacDonough Street Housing Development Fund Corporation
Respondent
Raymond Reid
Judge
Sulay K. Grant, J.
Decision/Order Date
2026-08-18
Posture
Pre-Answer Motion by Tenant
Disposition
Case Dismissed/discontinued
Winner
Tenant Substantially Won
Synopsis
Grimmet government-entwinement test satisfied: HDFC operates under Private Housing Finance Law Article XI, its deed and certificate of incorporation carry HPD approval requirements and low-income use covenants, and Board of Estimate resolutions provide a partial tax exemption running through July 2029. Constitutional due process therefore requires the HDFC to demonstrate 'cause' to evict. The notice of termination states only that the tenant 'failed to pay rent'—no period, no rate, no arrears balance. This is legally insufficient: vague and conclusory. Additionally, 16 HPD violations exist against the premises (15 served before the notice) and 40 building-wide violations, 2 of which are rent-impairing. Proceeding dismissed.
Keywords
HDFC; Private Housing Finance Law Article XI; General Business Law § 352-eeee; Government Entwinement; Constitutional Due Process; Grimmet Test; Good Cause Required for Eviction; 512 East 11th Street HDFC v Grimmet; Vague Predicate Notice; Failure to Pay Rent Allegation Insufficient
Recommended Citation
"141 MacDonough Street HDFC v. Reid" (2026). All Decisions. 2488.
https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/housing_court_all/2488
