Case Type
Holdover-Lease Expiration
Housing Type
Rent Stabilized
Court
Civil Court of the City of New York
County
New York County (Manhattan)
L&T / Index / Case / Docket / Clerk's Number
LT-315842-24/NY
Slip Opinion Number
2026 NY Slip Op 32139(U)
Petitioner
Vima Group Inc.
Respondent
Hongwei Zhang, John Doe, Jane Doe
Judge
Guthrie, Clinton J.
Decision/Order Date
2026-07-14
Posture
Post-Answer Motion by Landlord
Disposition
Case Dismissed/discontinued
Winner
Tenant Substantially Won
Synopsis
Court granted landlord's motion to amend petition to allege the small landlord exemption from GCEL and granted DHCR's motion to quash landlord's subpoena, but granted tenant's summary judgment motion and dismissed the petition because the apartment is presumptively rent stabilized under ETPA as it is in a building built before January 1, 1974 containing at least six residential units, and landlord failed to properly plead a recognized exemption from rent stabilization or a ground for eviction under the Rent Stabilization Code.
Keywords
Landlord Allowed to Amend Holdover Petition to Claim Small Landlord Exemption from GCEL – Landlord's Subpoena to DHCR Quashed – Proceeding Dismissed Because Apartment is Presumptively Subject to Rent Stabilization – Under ETPA Apartments in Buildings Containing 6 or More Units and Built Before 1974 are Presumptively Rent Stabilized
Recommended Citation
"Vima Group Inc. v. Zhang" (2026). All Decisions. 2375.
https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/housing_court_all/2375
