Case Type
Holdover-Lease Expiration
Housing Type
Rent Stabilized
Court
Civil Court of the City of New York
County
New York County (Manhattan)
L&T / Index / Case / Docket / Clerk's Number
LT-315206-22/NY
Slip Opinion Number
2025 NY Slip Op 51906(U)
Petitioner
417 E 9th Partners LLC, Witnick 417 E 9th St LLC
Respondent
Clinton Agresti, "John" "Doe", "Jane" "Doe"
Judge
Ofshtein, Eleanora
Decision/Order Date
2025-11-18
Posture
Post-judgment Motion by Landlord
Disposition
Motion Granted for Landlord
Winner
Landlord Substantially Won
Synopsis
In this holdover proceeding, the landlord, having already secured a judgment of possession and partial use and occupancy (U&O) after trial, moved for an additional money judgment for subsequent U&O and attorneys' fees. The tenant contended that MDL §302(1)(a) barred U&O collection due to a Certificate of Occupancy issue and that HSTPA amendments to RPAPL §702 precluded legal fees in summary proceedings. The court granted the landlord's motion, finding the U&O argument was barred by law of the case. It further held that RPAPL §702's intent was to prevent evictions for non-payment of fees mischaracterized as rent, not to prohibit a prevailing party from recovering non-possessory legal fees expressly allowed by lease.
Keywords
Attorneys’ Fees; HSTPA Amendment to RPAPL § 702 Does Not Bar Prevailing Party from Obtaining Money Judgment for Non-possessory Legal Fees Provided in Lease
Recommended Citation
"417 E 9th Partners LLC and Witnick 417 E 9th St LLC v Agresti" (2025). All Decisions. 2123.
https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/housing_court_all/2123
