Case Type
Commercial Holdover
Housing Type
Commercial
Court
Civil Court of the City of New York
County
Queens County (Queens)
L&T / Index / Case / Docket / Clerk's Number
LT-300756-25/QU
Petitioner
11114 101 Ave Corp.
Respondent
Mike Ramlogan, SIRI KRISHNA CAITANYA, MANDIR INC., & XYZ CORP.
Judge
Kagan, Mark
Decision/Order Date
2025-09-10
Posture
Other
Disposition
Other
Winner
Landlord Substantially Won
Synopsis
In this commercial holdover proceeding, the court denied the tenants' motion to reargue, affirming its prior decision that a summary proceeding can be brought against tenants at sufferance. The tenants argued that Article 7 of the RPAPL does not include tenants at sufferance as a class for which a summary proceeding is authorized, compelling the landlord to file an ejectment action in Supreme Court. The court rejected this, citing numerous precedents and reasoning that the language "recover possession" in RPL § 228 provides sufficient statutory basis for a summary proceeding in Housing Court.
Keywords
Commercial Holdover; Tenants at Sufferance; RPL § 228; Motion to Reargue Denied
Recommended Citation
"11114 101 Ave Corp. v. Ramlogan" (2025). All Decisions. 1947.
https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/housing_court_all/1947
