Case Type
Non-payment
Housing Type
Other
Court
Civil Court of the City of New York
County
New York County (Manhattan)
L&T / Index / Case / Docket / Clerk's Number
L&T 312830/24
Slip Opinion Number
2025 NY Slip Op 33278(U)
Petitioner
8 EAST 102ND STREET LLC
Respondent
DREW CHAPMAN, JANE KELLY, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE
Judge
Guthrie, Clinton J.
Decision/Order Date
2025-09-12
Posture
Post-answer Motion by Tenant
Disposition
Other
Winner
Landlord Substantially Won
Synopsis
In a nonpayment case, the court denied the tenant's motion to compel discovery, finding it moot because the landlord had produced the requested water tests in its opposition papers. The court also denied the tenant's separate request for further discovery, citing a prior stipulation between the parties. That stipulation mandated that the tenant withdraw her discovery motion if the landlord made a specific representation about the lack of other water quality complaints, which the landlord did. The court held that the parties are bound by the plain language of their stipulation.
Keywords
Discovery; Motion to Compel Production
Recommended Citation
"8 E. 102nd St. LLC v. Chapman" (2025). All Decisions. 1943.
https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/housing_court_all/1943
