Case Type

Article 78

Housing Type

Rent Stabilized

Court

Appellate Division, First Department

County

New York County (Manhattan)

L&T / Index / Case / Docket / Clerk's Number

151598/23

Slip Opinion Number

2024 NY Slip Op 05179

Petitioner

609 Realty LLC et al.

Respondent

New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal

Judge

Kotler, Lynn R.

Decision/Order Date

2024-10-22

Posture

Post Decision Petition

Disposition

Case Dismissed/discontinued

Winner

Tenant Substantially Won

Synopsis

The landlord’s application for a Major Capital Improvement (MCI) rent increase was denied by the DHCR, as less than 35% of apartments were rent-regulated. DHCR rationally applied the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act (HSTPA) amendments retroactively, as no determination had been made at the time of the law's enactment. The court found no due process violation or vested right to a future rent increase, and refused to consider the landlord’s unpreserved hardship claim.

Share

COinS