Case Type
Holdover-Lease Expiration
Housing Type
Rent Stabilized
Court
Civil Court of the City of New York
County
Bronx County (Bronx)
L&T / Index / Case / Docket / Clerk's Number
313214/21
Petitioner
Aminul Mia
Respondent
Faith Ursula Lyons, Hussuf Ginem, “JOHN DOEâ€, “JANE DOEâ€
Judge
Lutwak, Diane
Decision/Order Date
2024-06-24
Posture
Post-answer Motion by Tenant
Disposition
Motion Granted for Tenant
Winner
Tenant Substantially Won
Synopsis
The landlord initiated a holdover proceeding against the tenant, claiming that the tenant's tenancy had expired. The tenant defended the proceeding by asserting that the apartment was rent-stabilized. The landlord denied that the building contained six or more units. The court granted the tenant's motion for summary judgment, finding that the new evidence from the New York City Department of Buildings showed that the building had been converted to a seven-unit building in 2002, and that the tenant had met her burden of demonstrating a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The court rejected the landlord's argument that the tenant's family members were not "close family" and that the tenant's claims of confusion were not credible.
Recommended Citation
"Mia v. Lyons" (2024). All Decisions. 1614.
https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/housing_court_all/1614