Case Type

Article 78 Proceeding

Housing Type

Rent Stabilized Co-op

Court

Supreme Court of the State of New York

County

New York County (Manhattan)

L&T / Index / Case / Docket / Clerk's Number

159165/2023

Petitioner

251 W. 74 Owners Corp.

Respondent

New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal

Judge

Bluth, Arlene P.

Decision/Order Date

2024-02-14

Posture

Post-answer Motion by Landlord

Disposition

Motion Granted for Landlord

Winner

Landlord Substantially Won

Synopsis

Landlord's Article 78 challenge granted. Rent-stabilized tenants filed a complaint with DHCR seeking a rent reduction due to inoperable laundry facilities. DHCR issued a rent reduction order naming the building owner as the respondent, even though the tenants rented from a shareholder and not the building owner. The court found that DHCR violated due process by not naming and serving the shareholder, vacating the rent reduction order. Key legal points: due process requires parties with an interest in an administrative proceeding be named and served, and the definition of "owner" under the Rent Stabilization Law may differ from other contexts.

Share

COinS