Case Type
Non-payment
Housing Type
HDFC
Court
Civil Court of the City of New York
County
Kings County (Brooklyn)
L&T / Index / Case / Docket / Clerk's Number
77493/19
Slip Opinion Number
2024 NY Slip Op 24010
Petitioner
Casa Pasiva HDFC
Respondent
Rolando Machado
Judge
Weisberg, Michael L.
Decision/Order Date
2024-01-16
Posture
Post-answer Motion by Tenant
Disposition
Motion Granted for Tenant
Winner
Tenant Substantially Won
Synopsis
This is a non-payment case in which the tenant, who lives in a rent-stabilized HDFC apartment, owed over $40,000 in rent arrears. The landlord sought to evict the tenant, but the court granted the tenant's motion for a stay of eviction. The court found that the tenant had been paying his ongoing rent and that he had applied for rental assistance from the Department of Social Services. The court also found that the landlord would not be penalized by a further stay of the eviction. Key Legal Points: 1) A tenant's ongoing payment of rent can be a factor in a court's decision to grant a stay of eviction; 2) A tenant's application for rental assistance can also be a factor in a court's decision to grant a stay of eviction; 3) A court may consider whether a landlord will be penalized by a stay of eviction before granting the stay.
Recommended Citation
"CASA PASIVA HDFC v. Machado" (2024). All Decisions. 1296.
https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/housing_court_all/1296