Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Minnesota Law Review
Volume
97
Publication Date
2013
Keywords
Direct Democracy; Public Interest; Candidate Elections; Voting Ethics; Political Morality; Representation
Abstract
The voting levers in candidate elections and in direct democracy elections are identical. The political obligations that bind the citizens that pull them are not. This Essay argues that voters in direct democracy elections, unlike their counterparts in candidate elections, serve as representatives of the people and are, accordingly, bound by the ethics of political representation. Upending the traditional dichotomy between representative and direct democracy, this Essay explains why citizens voting in direct democracy are representative legislators who must vote in the public interest and must not vote in their private interests.
Recommended Citation
Michael Serota and Ethan J. Leib,
The Political Morality of Voting in Direct Democracy, 97 Minn. L. Rev. 1596
(2013)
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/606