This Comment describes how New York City abused both its short-term and long-term borrowing powers in response to its financial problems. The Comment concludes that New York City is guilty of fiscal practices that underscore the conclusion that constitutional debt ceilings are phantom regulations of municipal debt incurrence. The authors encourage thorough and decisive reform, and commend the Association of the Bar of the City of New York's proposed Local Finance Article.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.