HARNESSING PAYNE: CONTROLLING THE ADMISSION OF VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENTS TO SAFEGUARD CAPITAL SENTENCING HEARINGS FROM PASSION AND PREJUDICE

Authors

Beth E. SullivanFollow

Keywords

Capital punishment, Eighth Amendment, Victim Impact, Sentencing

Abstract

This article begins by tracing the historical development of victim impact evidence through Supreme Court jurisprudence and state legislation and analyzes their use in the sentencing of phase capital punishment trials. It argues that the Supreme Court's decision in Payne V Tennessee allowing a jury to consider victim impact evidence in capital punishment sentencing is troublesome in light of a capital punishment defendant's constitutional rights, the history of the death penalty and traditional sentencing procedures. It concludes with a proposal for guidelines to regulates the use of such evidence in capital punishment sentencing,

Recommended Citation

Beth E. Sullivan, HARNESSING PAYNE: CONTROLLING THE ADMISSION OF VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENTS TO SAFEGUARD CAPITAL SENTENCING HEARINGS FROM PASSION AND PREJUDICE, 25 Fordham Urb. L.J. 601 (1998).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol25/iss3/9