Keywords
law school, teaching, professor, legal education, MacCrate, effectiveness
Abstract
This Article examines law school teaching evaluation techniques and probes the use of a law school alumni survey to measure teaching effectiveness. The Article focuses on a survey of St. Thomas University School of Law graduates. The Article also examines teaching effectiveness in the context of the MacCrate Report and the so called gaps between legal education and law practice it identified. The Article argues that the MacCrate Report was incomplete in its coverage of teaching effectiveness, and that much of the discord it created can be overcome by focusing on teaching effectiveness.
Recommended Citation
Daniel Gordon,
Does Law Teaching Have Meaning? Teaching Effectiveness, Gauging Alumni Competence, and the MacCrate Report,
25 Fordham Urb. L.J. 43
(1997).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol25/iss1/2