In this response to Burt Neuborne's Who's Afraid of the Human Rights Commission, the author seeks to challenge many of the assumptions underlying Neuborne's model calling for increased focus on preventative measures by the Human Rights Commission. In Part I, the author addresses Neuborne's moral arguments and concludes that he undermines the ability of sanctions to deter future conduct. In Part II, the article suggests that although the Human Rights Commission is faced with fewer resources, Neuborne's model for increased preventative enforcement resources would have only a limited impact on employers and would undermine significantly the remedial purpose of human rights statutes.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.