New York Revises Ethics Rules to Permit Limited MDPs: A Critical Analysis of the New York Approach, the Future of the MDP Debate After Enron, and Recommendations for Other Jurisdictions

Authors

John P. Lucci

Keywords

tax, Big Five, accounting firms, ethics, accountants, multidisciplinary practices, MDPs, New York, Enron, Arthur Andersen, Cannon 33, Cannon 34, Commission on Multidisciplinary Practice, Model Rule 5.4, District of Columbia, client efficiency, transaction costs, Germany, France, conseil juridique, captive law firm, Federationof Law Societies of Canada, Law Council of Australia, regulation, regulated, independent judgment, DR 1-106, DR 1-107, consent agreement, transactional lawyers, nonlawyers

Recommended Citation

John P. Lucci, New York Revises Ethics Rules to Permit Limited MDPs: A Critical Analysis of the New York Approach, the Future of the MDP Debate After Enron, and Recommendations for Other Jurisdictions, 8 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 151 (2003).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/jcfl/vol8/iss1/6