In The Wake of Empagran – Lights Out on Foreign Activity Falling Under Sherman Act Jurisdiction? Courts Carve Out A Prevailing Standard

Authors

Kelly L. Tucker

Keywords

Antitrust, private antitrust, foreign antitrust, anticompetitive business activities/conduct, Sherman Act, fair trade, antitrust extraterritorial jurisdiction, global price-fixing conspiracy claims, Empagran v. F. Hoffinann-LaRoche, Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act, FTAIA, Export Trading Act, American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., United States v. Sisal Sales Corp., effects doctrine in foreign antitrust, rule-of-reason test in foreign antitrust, United States v. Aluminum Co. of America ("Alcoa"), international comity, foreign blocking statutes and extraterritorial jurisdiction, causation standard in extraterritorial jurisdiction, ‘Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of America, N.T. and S.A’, F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A., Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California, MM Global Servs., Inc. v. Dow Chem. Co., Snaido v. Bank Austria AG

Recommended Citation

Kelly L. Tucker, In The Wake of Empagran – Lights Out on Foreign Activity Falling Under Sherman Act Jurisdiction? Courts Carve Out A Prevailing Standard, 15 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 807 (2009).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/jcfl/vol15/iss3/7