Keywords
Internal Revenue Service or IRS, cost-sharing, tax, territorial tax system, defer, profit, transfer pricing, Section 482 or § 482, arm’s length, intangible property, buy-in, Xilinx, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner or Xilinx, parent, subsidiary, Preliminary or Contemporaneous Transaction or PCT, investor model, intellectual property, industry practice, worldwide tax system
Recommended Citation
James D. Mandolfo,
The IRS’s Cost-Sharing Proposals in the Worldwide Tax System: Why Congress Should Avoid Anti-Competitive Transfer Pricing Regulations and Embrace a Territorial Tax,
12 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 371
(2007).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/jcfl/vol12/iss2/4