Home > IPLJ > Vol. XXVIII > No. 4 (2018)
Keywords
Game theory, prisoner's dilemma, copyrights, patents, trade secrets, intellectual property, content creation, optimal, iterated, multiplayer, multi-player, philosophy, payoff, escrow, trust, John Locke, Lockean theory, tragedy, commons, Machlup, Boldrin, Levine, Palmer, Stallman, Venice, guild, cost, economics, exclusive, rights, international union, Dickens, Twain, TRIPS, Hardin
Abstract
In this article, I will offer an argument for the protection of intellectual property based on individual self-interest and prudence. In large part, this argument will parallel considerations that arise in a prisoner’s dilemma game. In brief, allowing content to be unprotected in terms of free access leads to a sub-optimal outcome where creation and innovation are suppressed. Adopting the institutions of copyright, patent, and trade secret is one way to avoid these sub-optimal results.
Recommended Citation
Adam D. Moore,
Intellectual Property and the Prisoner’s Dilemma: A Game Theory Justification of Copyrights, Patents, and Trade Secrets,
28 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 831
(2018).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol28/iss4/3
Included in
Intellectual Property Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons