Abstract
Part I of this Essay traces the traditional divide between EU law and the law of international arbitration. This Essay then identifies two developments, both emanating from the EU-law side of the equation, that are in the process of altering this landscape. The first, discussed in Part II, is the prospective amendment on arbitration to the Brussels Regulation on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments; the second, discussed in Part III, is the transfer of exclusive competence over policy in the area of foreign direct investment, itself a developing arena of international arbitration, to the EU from the Member States. Because both developments are so nascent, it is difficult to gauge the magnitude of the problems they may create, much less delineate the steps required to mitigate them. At this early stage, this Essay simply draws attention to the new realities and to the nature of the challenges they present.
Recommended Citation
George A. Bermann,
Reconciling European Union Law Demands with the Demands of International Arbitration,
34 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1193
(2011).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj/vol34/iss5/2