Abstract
This Note discusses how international common law should act as federal common law in U.S. courts. This Note also explores the constitutional challenges involved in incorporating customary international law into U.S. federal common law. Such challenges revolve around the institutions of representative democracy, federal jurisdiction, and the doctrine of separation of powers. Part I of this Note discusses federal common law and customary international law. Part II of this Note presents the negative and positive effects of incorporating customary international law into federal common law. This Note concludes that to preserve national honor among the community of nations, and to protect U.S. citizens from powerful national and international factions, the U.S. federal courts must continue their incorporation of customary international law as a part of federal common law. As in the days of Jonathan Smith, customary international law is the answer to reprehensible oppression.
Recommended Citation
F. Giba-Matthews,
Customary International Law Acts As Federal Common Law in U.S. Courts,
20 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1839
(1996).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj/vol20/iss5/12