Abstract
There seems to be a prevailing assumption that advocacy before the United States Court of International Trade (CIT or the court) somehow differs from advocacy in general. I suggest that to a large degree it does not. Despite the similarities to practice in other courts, there are a few matters worth noting about practice in a court that is designed to interpret a few statutes in a uniform manner, especially statutes that are intended to be comprehensive. Now that I have stated the general rules, I would like to mention a few somewhat more philosophical considerations and exceptions.
Recommended Citation
Jane A. Restani,
Remarks on Advocacy Before the United States Court of International Trade,
10 Fordham Int'l L.J. 141
(1986).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj/vol10/iss2/1