Case Type
Holdover-Breach of Lease
Housing Type
Rent Stabilized
Court
Civil Court of the City of New York
County
New York County (Manhattan)
L&T / Index / Case / Docket / Clerk's Number
LT-303580-24/NY
Petitioner
14th Street Associates L.P.
Respondent
Marek Przystup, Sabrina Przystup, “John Doe”, “Jane Doe”
Judge
Meyers, Adam, R.
Decision/Order Date
2025-10-06
Posture
Post-answer Motion by Tenant
Disposition
Other
Winner
Other
Synopsis
In this holdover proceeding alleging the tenant's objectionable conduct due to noxious odors, the tenant filed a multi-part motion. The court denied the tenant's motion to dismiss, finding the landlord's predicate notices sufficiently particular regarding the nature and dates of the alleged odors. However, the court largely granted the tenant's motion to compel a bill of particulars, holding that identifying information of complaining tenants constituted amplification of the landlord's claims. Information about the landlord's agents, however, was deemed evidentiary and beyond the scope. The court denied the tenant's motion for discovery, finding no ample need, and the case was scheduled for settlement or trial.
Keywords
Landlord Compelled to Respond to Demand of Particulars; Breach of Substantial Obligation of Tenancy/Nuisance; Odors
Recommended Citation
"14th Street Associates L.P. v. Przystup" (2025). All Decisions. 1985.
https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/housing_court_all/1985
