constitutional rights; foreign nations
Clarity would be promoted by treating Article III—which primarily concerns subject matter jurisdiction over three categories of “Cases” and six types of “Controversies”— separately from Due Process issues such as personal jurisdiction. Moreover, Article III’s text and history indicate that its drafters included “Controversies . . . between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects” to ensure that such disputes would be resolved impartially by federal judges who, unlike their state counterparts, enjoyed tenure and salary guarantees that insulated them from political pressure.
Robert J. Pushaw Jr.,
Novel Perspectives on Due Process Symposium: Do Foreign Nations Have Constitutional Rights?,
88 Fordham L. Rev.
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flro/vol88/iss1/12