Keywords
professional responsibility; courts; judicial regulation; ethics
Abstract
This Article proceeds in three parts. Part I considers variation in the rule promulgation process across the states. Part II identifies ways in which the promulgation process might be reformed on the basis of empirical evidence. Part III considers the potential benefits and limitations to this approach and is followed by a brief conclusion
Recommended Citation
Emily S. Taylor Poppe,
Evidence-Based Promulgation: The Rulemaking Process for Rules of Professional Conduct,
89 Fordham L. Rev. 1275
(2021).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol89/iss4/10