Keywords
criminal convictions; guilt; reform
Abstract
A curious tension exists in scholarly discourse about the criminal legal system. On the one hand, a copious body of work exposes a variety of facets of the system that jeopardize the reliability of convictions. These include factors whose influence is pervasive: the predominance of plea bargaining, for example, and the subordination of the defense. On the other hand, scholars often discuss people who have criminal convictions in a way that appears to assume crime commission. This apparent assumption obscures crucial failings of the system, muddies the role of academia, and, given the unequal distribution of criminal convictions, risks compounding race- and class-based stereotypes of criminality. From careful examination of this phenomenon and its possible explanations, reform proposals emerge.
Recommended Citation
Anna Roberts,
Convictions as Guilt,
88 Fordham L. Rev. 2501
(2020).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol88/iss6/15