Keywords
Immigration; universal representation; deportation defense
Abstract
In an era in which there is little good news for immigrant communities and even holding the line has become an ambitious goal, one progressive project has continued to gain steam: the movement to provide universal representation for noncitizens in removal proceedings. This effort, initially born out of a pilot project in New York City, has generated a host of replication projects throughout the nation and holds the promise of even broader expansion. But as it grows, this effort must confront challenges from within: the sort-of supporters who want to limit this representation system’s coverage in a number of ways, some of which may not merely change the scope of the program, but the core of the project itself.
Recommended Citation
Lindsay Nash,
Universal Representation,
87 Fordham L. Rev. 503
(2018).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol87/iss2/2