Keywords
symposium; family law; public policy
Abstract
Part I of this Article briefly explores the culture wars that have consumed American politics since Moore. Part II discusses Moore’s uneasy position within the conception of family as a matter of choice versus tradition. Then, to the extent that the Moore Court addressed the changing family, Part III shows how it did so by treating the extended family as a manifestation of traditional family values, not the newly emerging substantive family values that valorize delay in childbearing and financial independence. Finally, Part IV considers Moore's missed opportunities to examine the relationship between family form, race, and class.
Recommended Citation
June Carbone and Naomi Cahn,
Moore’s Potential,
85 Fordham L. Rev. 2589
(2017).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol85/iss6/6