University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal
This essay addresses the enforcement of decisions through internet instruments. The starting point is a brief justification of internet enforcement as the obligation of democratic states. Next, the essay argues that the movement to re-engineer the internet infrastructure by public and private actions also facilitates state enforcement of legal and policy decisions. The essay maintains that states will increasingly try to use network intermediaries such as payment systems and Internet Service Providers as enforcement instruments. Finally, and most importantly, the essay focuses on ways that states may harness the power of technological instruments such as worms, filters and packet interceptors to enforce decisions and sanction malfeasance.
Joel R. Reidenberg,
States and Internet Enforcement, 1 U. Ottawa L. & Tech. J. 213
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/43