Transboundary resource disputes are often analyzed by reference to two nebulous and conflicting principles that have emerged in international environmental law: “equitable and reasonable utilization” and “no significant harm.” Frequently overlooked in this context is the potential value of other canons of international law—especially human rights law, criminal law, and the rules governing the use of force—in adding definition to the muddled contours of these foundational precepts. This Article therefore undertakes an assessment of sovereign rights and obligations regarding shared natural resources which arise from these other bodies of law. In doing so, it offers new lenses through which to evaluate competing state resource claims. It also provides fresh perspective on longstanding controversies in international law relating to extraterritorial jurisdiction, conflict of rights, and non-military attacks or uses of force.
Beyond Equity: Shared Natural Resources and Human Rights, Criminal Law, and the Use of Force,
32 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 567
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/elr/vol32/iss3/6
Administrative Law Commons, Admiralty Commons, Agency Commons, Agriculture Law Commons, Air and Space Law Commons, Animal Law Commons, Civil Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Construction Law Commons, Cultural Heritage Law Commons, Disaster Law Commons, Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, European Law Commons, Food and Drug Law Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Land Use Law Commons, Law of the Sea Commons, Natural Law Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Torts Commons, Water Law Commons