•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The Supreme Court of the United States held in National League of Cities v. Usery that Congress had exceeded its powers under the commerce clause by enacting the 1974 amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act. The reasoning behind the decision was that Congress was prohibited from using the commerce clause in areas which states were considered to be performing an essential government function. Because the Supreme Court did not explain precisely what is considered an essential government function, courts have been forced to make case-by-case determinations in deciding these types of cases. One area were these issues are brought to the fore is railroad employee regulation because of the essential nature of commuter rail transportation. This Note provides an examination of the National League case. It then attempts to analyze the "essential government function" language of the decision and formulate a coherent definition of the term. Finally, it examines the impact of the clear definition on some local regulations of commuter rail transportation.

Share

COinS
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.