•  
  •  
 

Authors

Gary D. Stumpp

Abstract

The authority of the police to enforce the statutory restrictions governing vehicle and traffic laws has often been considered to be concomitant with a right to stop motorists arbitrarily to determine their compliance. Recently, some courts have eroded this power, to protect the constitutional rights guaranteed to individuals under the fourth amendment. In their consideration of these arbitrary automobile stops, the courts have utilized a balancing process. They consider the state interest in promoting public safety on the highways through the guaranteed enforcement of the relevant laws, as well as the duty of the police to detect and control crime. Additionally, there is the interest of the individual in unrestricted travel and his penumbral right of privacy under the United States Constitution. The elements considered by the courts in the balancing process have not changed; rather, it is the weight attached to each which is outcome determinative. The courts initially permitted such stops in all instances. Later, this was restricted to some degree. Now, however, some courts have held the individual’s rights to be paramount. This Comment will survey the judicial tests that have been developed to eliminate arbitrary stops, and examine their effectiveness in protection the rights of motorists.

Share

COinS
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.