This article contains a selection of advice on how to improve the judicial selection system. The article explains that reconsideration of the judicial appointive systems must include both the broadly theoretical and the intensely practical. It should identify the key questions that must be addressed in creating a system of judicial appointment, elaborate and defend the principles that should guide choices among alternative appointive systems, and clarify how those principles can be translated into institutional arrangements that will advance the goal of a quality judiciary. This reconsideration should also take seriously the arguments and claims of those who oppose the appointment of judges. Insofar as the concerns of opponents are valid, efforts should be made to design an appointive system that is responsive to those concerns.
G. Alan Tarr,
DESIGNING AN APPOINTIVE SYSTEM: THE KEY ISSUES,
34 Fordham Urb. L.J. 291
Available at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol34/iss1/16