•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This article examines the way municipalities have used increasingly broad interpretations of "blight" to compete for state tax increment financing (TIFs) for economic development purposes. It traces the definition of blight in the context of state and federal urban redevelopment programs from the nineteenth century through the Progressive Era to the advent of TIF laws in the 1980s and 90s. It goes on to discuss the how the concept of "blight" has shifted from a condition of substandard housing to a condition of "sub-optimal" local economic development, in part due to intense competition among municipalities for TIFs. The article concludes that excessively broad state definitions of "blight" and concepts like "future blight" have fueled a "tax grab" and converted TIF laws from tools for eradicating substandard housing conditions to a way for municipalities to "pad the tax base." To combat this effect, the article proposes various TIF law reforms, most significantly the addition of "but for" tests that would prevent municipalities from defining an area as "blighted" unless it is unlikely to receive private investment.

Included in

Housing Law Commons

Share

COinS
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.