This article offers a number of suggestions concerning how judges should act in problem solving court contexts to spark the motivation of the individual to achieve rehabilitation and increase compliance with treatment. The proposals are derived from psychological literature in other contexts but further analysis and empirical research is needed. The article finds that therapeutic jurisprudence can contribute to the functioning of problem solving courts which can refine therapeutic jurisprudence approaches.
Bruce J. Winick,
Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Problem Solving Courts,
30 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1055
Available at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol30/iss3/4