This article argues that litigation is largely counterproductive to the development of a coherent and feasible social welfare policy and interferes with the constitutionally-derived separation of powers. It describes the proper role of the courts when evaluating government actions and the proper procedures for doing so. It then discusses several cases brought against the New York State Department of Social Services and local governments, arguing that the courts have abandoned their appropriate role, and using these decisions to illustrate its thesis.
Susan V. Demers,
The Failures of Litigation as a Tool for the Development of Social Welfare Policy,
22 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1009
Available at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol22/iss4/7