Panel III: Cable Versus the Telephone Companies: Can Telephone Companies Be Constitutionally Barred From Delivering Video Programming?

Authors

David E. Bronston, New York City Department of Telecommunications & EnergyFollow
James J. Gilligan, U.S. Department of Justice
Mark C. Hansen, Kellogg, Huber & Hansen
Joseph A. Post, NYNEX CorporationFollow

Keywords

cable, telecommunications, constitution, regulation, First Amendment, common carriage, FCC, 1984 Cable Franchise Policy & Communications Act, free speech, cross-ownership, standards of review, competition, cross-subsidization, information services, O'Brien test, rational basis test, antitrust law

Recommended Citation

David E. Bronston, James J. Gilligan, Mark C. Hansen, and Joseph A. Post, Panel III: Cable Versus the Telephone Companies: Can Telephone Companies Be Constitutionally Barred From Delivering Video Programming? , 4 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 749 (1994).
Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol4/iss3/3