Case Type
Rent Overcharge
Housing Type
Rent Stabilized
Court
Appellate Division, First Department
County
New York County (Manhattan)
L&T / Index / Case / Docket / Clerk's Number
450212/21
Slip Opinion Number
2026 NY Slip Op 05856
Petitioner
Sula Malina, et al.
Respondent
158 Management LLC, et al.
Judge
Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kennedy, Friedman, Kapnick, Higgitt, JJ.
Decision/Order Date
2026-10-08
Posture
Post-Answer Motion by Tenant
Disposition
Judgment for Tenant
Winner
Tenant Substantially Won
Synopsis
In this rent overcharge action, tenants moved for summary judgment declaring their apartments rent stabilized and establishing the frozen legal regulated rent. App Div 1st affirmed. The landlord's claimed pre-HSTPA high-rent vacancy deregulation based on IAIs failed because landlord submitted no invoices, contracts, or checks specific to the affected apartment and no testimony tying renovation records to the unit. Landlord therefore failed to establish sufficiently costly improvements to support deregulation. Under RSL § 26-517(e) and RSC § 2528.4(a), the legal regulated rent is frozen at the last reliable DHCR-registered stabilized rent until landlord complies with registration requirements.
Keywords
Fraudulent Deregulation; Rent Overcharge; Summary Judgment Granted Declaring Fraudulent Deregulation; Landlord Failed to Raise Triable Issue of Fact as to Whether it Did the Work Underlying its Claimed IAIs; Legal Regulated Rent Remains Frozen at Last Reliable Rent Registered with DHCR Under RSL § 26-517[e] & RSC § 2528.4[a]
Recommended Citation
"Malina v. 158 Mgt. LLC" (2026). All Decisions. 2522.
https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/housing_court_all/2522
